| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A command that exists but is undocumented might as well not exist: the agent had no way to
learn that `hermes` exists, that `chat` is taken, that replies are asynchronous, or that
the cursor is milliseconds. Skill covers the commands, the chat_hermes tool, the failure
table (401/413/429/503/507), the rules that keep it useful, and how to verify a send.
Seeded from skill-pack-core._buildSkills() so every fresh session gets it; mirrored to
skills/chatting-with-hermes.{md,json} + index.json (19 entries).
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(v4.6.65)
Packet 9. `terminal-commands-silently-failing` and `command-composition-rules` described
the same bug family from two angles, and since v4.6.58 both were describing behaviour
that is now refused outright.
- new seeded skill `command-composition-rules` in skill-pack-core's _buildSkills():
the rule, why the refusal exists (with the 42-42 / 34k-a measurement), what works
(one command per call, wc multi-path, interactive-only pipes, quoted operators),
how to verify a plausible-looking result, and the pitfalls
- its History section names both retired skills so a reader arriving from either
search finds the surviving one
- mirrored onto disk as skills/command-composition-rules.md + .json and added to
skills/index.json (18 entries) so the repo copy matches what sessions receive
Verified live on v4.6.65: seeding reported 15 skills (was 14), the file and index
entry exist in the fresh VFS, and the natural-language query "does the terminal have
a shell and what is refused" returns command-composition-rules first (13.78, 3/4).
|
